Warren Buffett’s business partner kicked himself for making a multibillion-dollar error —and explained how he avoids repeating mistakes

Warren Buffet Charlie Munger Berkshire Hathaway
Warren Buffett (left) and Charlie Munger.

  • Warren Buffett’s right-hand man missed out on billions of dollars due to a single mistake.
  • Charlie Munger made the costly decision not to buy more shares of Belridge Oil in the late 1970s.
  • Munger discussed the importance of seizing opportunities, and how he avoids repeating mistakes.

Warren Buffett’s 97-year-old business partner explained why he welcomes market panic, reflected on one of the pair’s best investments, and recalled how he personally missed out on a multibillion-dollar windfall during a recent episode of the “Think With Pinker” podcast.

Charlie Munger, the vice-chairman of Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate, also criticized mutual funds for misleading marketing, detailed how he avoids repeating mistakes, and underlined the importance of seizing opportunities when they appear.

Here are Munger’s 10 best quotes from the interview, lightly edited and condensed for clarity:

1. “Value investors like Warren and me look for intrinsic value and ignore the noise of the constant movement of stock prices. But we look at the patterns of the noise to pick our hiding places for value investments in both time and place.” 

2. “The Washington Post was just a trove of intrinsic value. Here was a time of low stock prices and panic, and a place where one stock got clobbered for an unusual reason to a suddenly low level. We just charged in and bought $10 million worth of The Washington Post, and in due course it became worth $1 billion.” — Munger noted the newspaper owned television stations that were “total gold mines,” and fears of retribution from the Nixon administration after the Watergate exposé had hammered its stock.

3. “An idiot could figure out that The Washington Post was selling at a huge discount to intrinsic value. An opportunity like that doesn’t come along very often. But you don’t need an opportunity like that very often, once in a lifetime is enough.”

4. “Every good card player knows that you’ve got to not blow your opportunities. You don’t get that many. Not enough people carry that card-playing wisdom over into practical life.”

5. “You don’t get that many good opportunities in a lifetime. It really matters whether, when the few do come along, you reach out and grab them vigorously.”

6. “It really helped us to have everybody else believe in the efficient market theory in its hardest form. It was an interesting example of a learned profession going bonkers.” — referring to the idea that markets correctly price assets so bargains don’t exist.

7. “The trouble with the efficient markets idea is that it was approximately right, but economists got the idea that it was absolutely always right as if it were a law of physics, and of course it wasn’t. Warren and I had the advantage of being imperfectly educated, and therefore we thought the academics were stark raving mad. Which of course they were.”

8. “It’s really fraudulent what they do. Nobody in the mutual-fund world seems to find that practice of picking a phony winner like that, and then using it in the advertising, as crooked and detestable. But of course it is crooked and detestable.” — blasting mutual funds that launch a bunch of different strategies then later pick the best-performing one to trumpet and ignore the rest.

9. “It was one of the stupidest mistakes I ever made. Now, it doesn’t look on my record like I’m that stupid because I started with nothing and I have billions. But I would have had twice as many billions if I’d just made a different decision about Belridge Oil.” — Munger bought 300 shares of the energy company’s shares in 1977, but declined to buy another 1,500 shares shortly afterward. Shell acquired Belridge two years later at about 30 times the price he paid. If Munger had amassed 1,800 shares of Belridge, he could have sold them for $6.6 million and invested that money in Berkshire for a stake worth more than $10 billion today.

10. “I just know that if I rub my nose in my own mistakes, I’m less likely to commit new ones of the same type. So I just go through my life rubbing my nose in my own past mistakes. It works in training a dog and so I think it would work on me.”

Read more: Mario Gabelli has racked up a 7,000% gain on Berkshire Hathaway stock. The billionaire investor explains why he likes Robinhood, still backs Warren Buffett, and worries about the Fed taper.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Donald Trump has fundraised over $100 million as he eyes a possible 2024 presidential run, despite being banned from social media, report says

Trump Florida rally
Former President Donald Trump speaks at a rally at the Sarasota Fairgrounds in Sarasota, Fla., on July 3, 2021.

  • Donald Trump raised millions of dollars through his fundraising operations, a Washington Post report says.
  • Although barred from using the money to fund a presidential campaign, he can use it for other political activities.
  • The former president has been increasingly hinting at a 2024 presidential run.

Former President Donald Trump has raised millions of dollars through his fundraising committees despite being banned from social media, a new report from The Washington Post says.

In July, the most recent date, his three primary fundraising arms were required to report their donations to the Federal Election Commission. The committees declared more than $100 million in cash on hand, the paper said.

Advisers say that the former president has been consistently raising more than $1 million per week, often reaching totals nearing $2 million, according to the paper.

Trump’s three primary fundraising sources are Save America PAC, Save America Joint Fundraising Committee, and the Make America Great Again PAC.

The former president is legally barred from using money raised through these committees to finance a presidential campaign directly. It would require them to operate under different fundraising and spending limitations.

He can use the money to fund his current political operations, including paying for staff and rallies but would have to start from scratch if he announces a presidential run.

However, the vast sums of money Trump has shown that he remains a formidable political candidate.

Trump could also transfer the money to an outside group that supports his candidacy, The Post said, or if nothing else, it could give him a headstart in establishing a donor base.

The former president has managed to raise these funds despite social media bans which have seen him permanently barred from Twitter and barred from Facebook until at least 2023.

Despite his ban, his political action committees have been allowed to continue buying ads and operating on Facebook through the “Team Trump” Facebook page.

According to The Washington Post, Save America has spent more than $100,000 a week this month on Facebook ads, many soliciting donations from his supporters.

The ads often cite false claims of electoral fraud, criticisms of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, and false warnings that Democrats favor immigrants over American citizens.

Some of the ads offer donors the chance to win a trip to meet the former president and attend one of his rallies.

“DO YOU MISS TRUMP? DONATE TO STAND WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP,” the ads often say.

Ads asking for donations by the "Team Trump" Facebook page.
Ads asking for donations by the “Team Trump” Facebook page.

His groups also fundraise by holding donors’ events and sending barrages of emails and text messages to supporters.

Trump also recently launched a newly rebranded Super PAC called Make America Great Again, Again!.

The new committee is due to support “Trump-endorsed candidates across the country who have proven to be fighters of the MAGA movement.”

Before rebranding, it reported $5.6 million in cash at the end of July, The Post reported.

Although Trump has not yet announced a 2024 election run, he has been increasingly hinting at it.

This week his former chief of staff Mark Meadows said he would bet all of his money on the former president running in the next election.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Women flocked to the stock market during COVID. They include one who overheard a conversation about Wall Street Bets and another who lost her home in 2008.

Wall Street girl stocks investing
  • The number of women investing surged amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the Washington Post reported.
  • One woman started investing after overhearing a conversation about Wall Street Bets, the Post said.
  • Another began her portfolio in the hopes of avoiding the financial struggles her family faced in the 2008 crisis.

Women investors flooded the stock market amid the COVID-19 pandemic, as some were inspired by meme-stock mania and others were prompted by scars from the last recession.

Twenty-seven-year-old Sabrina Scull told the Washington Post that she overheard two men in Central Park talking about Reddit’s Wall Street Bets and the GameStop frenzy that captured the market’s attention at the beginning of this year.

She went home and researched what was happening, according to the Post’s article titled, “These millennial women hadn’t invested before. The pandemic was ‘a wake-up call.’

Scull opened a Robinhood account and invested $1,000 in mainly green and solar companies – instead of meme companies – according to the Post. Since then, her investments increased by 7%. Scull, an assistant editor at Ecological Society of America, did not immediately respond to a LinkedIn message from Insider.

The number of women on Robinhood quadrupled in February this year alone, to make up about a third of the customer base, Bloomberg reported at the time. In general, the mania around meme stocks awakened a new generation of investors, Insider wrote previously.

As investors flocked to the stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic, Fidelity Investments found that the number of female customers jumped 9% in 2020, outpacing new male customers, which rose 7%, Quartz reported.

Another woman, 25-year-old Juli Adhikari, told the Post she googled “how to invest” in April 2020 and opened an account with Ellevest, an investment platform targeted to women investors.

Amid the 2008 recession, Adhikari said she had “definitely felt” the impacts of the crisis and had to move homes. Twelve years later an adult during the pandemic, she wanted to change her financial situation, the Post wrote.

In a message to Insider, Adhikari, a policy and advocacy coordinator for the Women’s Initiative at American Progress, said she was extremely cautious and unsure in the beginning of her investment journey.

But, she told Insider, “My confidence has only compounded over time as I gain first hand exposure and experience in this world.”

A recent report from Fidelity Investments, found that more women are joining the stock market, and they’re even outdoing men. In the last decade, “women not only realized positive returns on their investments, but also outperformed their male counterparts by 40 basis points,” the report said.

Read the original article on Business Insider

McConnell called Trump ‘a fading brand’ and said ‘sucking up’ to him ‘is not a strategy that works’: book

Trump McConnell
Then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell with President Donald Trump on July 20, 2020.

  • Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called former President Donald Trump a “fading brand.”
  • “Sucking up to Donald Trump is not a strategy that works,” he said, according to the new book “Peril.”
  • McConnell blamed Trump for lying to Americans about the election and provoking the Capitol riot.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called former President Donald Trump a “fading brand” and insisted that the Republican party is moving away from the former president, according to Bob Woodward and Robert Costa’s new book, “Peril.”

McConnell called Trump an “OTTB as they say in Kentucky – off-the-track Thoroughbred” during a conversation with Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, who McConnell dubbed the “Trump whisperer.”

“‘There is a clear trend moving,’ McConnell said, toward a place where the GOP is not dominated by Trump. McConnell added, “Sucking up to Donald Trump is not a strategy that works,'” Woodward and Costa wrote.

McConnell noted that he might face conflict with Trump if the former president endorses Senate candidates that the leader and other Republicans don’t support.

“The only place I can see Trump and me actually at loggerheads would be if he gets behind some clown who clearly can’t win,” McConnell said. “To have a chance of getting the Senate back, you have to have the most electable candidates possible.”

McConnell publicly blamed Trump for provoking the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, calling the then-president “practically and morally responsible” for the deadly attack.

“The mob was fed lies,” McConnell said in a speech from the Senate floor on Jan. 19. “They were provoked by the president and other powerful people, and they tried to use fear and violence to stop a specific proceeding of the first branch of the federal government, which they did not like.”

But he ultimately did not vote to impeach Trump for inciting the riot.

Since leaving office, Trump has repeatedly attacked McConnell, calling him “a dour, sullen, and unsmiling political hack” in one February statement.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Former ambassador Kelly Craft steered business to Trump hotels, The Washington Post reports

Trump and former ambassador Kelly Craft at a press conference
President Donald Trump speaks to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Kelly Craft, right, at a luncheon with members of the United Nations Security Council in the Cabinet Room at the White House in Washington, Thursday, Dec. 5, 2019.

  • Kelly Craft was a longtime Republican activist in Kentucky before becoming an ambassador.
  • In 2017, she was named US ambassador to Canada.
  • Two years later, former President Trump made her the US ambassador to the United Nations.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

A Republican activist who served as an ambassador under Donald Trump steered business to the former president’s line of hotels, The Washington Post reported Friday, citing emails released by the State Department. The move was first reported by Forbes.

Kelly Craft was a major GOP donor in Kentucky before being picked to serve as US ambassador to Canada in 2017. She and her husband – Joe Craft, chief executive of the coal company Alliance Resource Partners – donated millions of dollars to Republican candidates. In 2019, Trump named her to replace Nikki Halley as US ambassador to the United Nations.

It was in 2018 that Craft, expected to attend a conference back in Washington, DC, rejected a list of suggested hotels from her staff, saying “I would prefer the TRUMP HOTEL,” The Post reported.

Earlier that year, Craft also rejected a staffer’s suggestion of a “boutique hotel” near a conference she was attending in Maryland. “Let’s keep TRUMP Hotel,” she wrote.

Trump’s chain of hotels, and the steering of official business to them, was a frequent subject of criticism from Democrats and outside ethics experts while Trump was president. The Center for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington, a watchdog group, accused Trump of violating the emoluments clause of the US Constitution – which prohibits a federal officeholder from accepting gifts from a foreign state – over the fact foreign officials were frequently opting to stay and spend money at the Trump hotel in Washington.

The former president also suggested holding the 2020 G7 summit at his struggling resort in Miami, Florida, backing down after criticism from ethics experts.

Now that he’s out of office, The Trump Organization, which oversees the line of hotels, is currently trying to sell its property in DC.

Have a news tip? Email this reporter: cdavis@insider.com

Read the original article on Business Insider

Major news outlets call for Biden’s ‘unequivocal’ support of journalists reporting in Afghanistan after the Taliban took over the government

Us embassy Kabul evacuation
A U.S. Chinook helicopter flies near the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, Sunday, Aug. 15, 2021. Helicopters are landing at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul as diplomatic vehicles leave the compound amid the Taliban advanced on the Afghan capital.

  • Leaders at major news organizations called on the US government to support their journalists in Afghanistan.
  • Publishers at The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post signed the letter.
  • Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, fell to Taliban forces Sunday after the former Afghan president fled the nation.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Leaders at major news organizations are calling on President Joe Biden to support and protect journalists reporting on the ground in Afghanistan after the Taliban took over the government.

The open letter, written by publishers of The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New York Times, is seeking an “unequivocal signal” that the Biden administration will “stand behind the free press.”

“For the past twenty years, brave Afghan colleagues have worked tirelessly to help The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal share news and information from the region with the global public,” they wrote. “Now, those colleagues and their families are trapped in Kabul, their lives in peril.”

The letter was signed by Frederick J. Ryan, Jr., publisher and chief executive officer of The Post, Almar Latour of The Journal, and AG Sulzberger of The Times.

They asked that the US government facilitate the journalists’ “protected access” to a US-controlled airport in the country, grant them safe passage to the airport, and facilitate “air movement out of the country.”

On Sunday, Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan, fell to Taliban forces, marking the first time the group regained control in the country in 20 years. Taliban insurgents stormed the presidential palace, and former Afghan President Ashraf Ghani fled the nation over the weekend.

President Joe Biden delivered his first remarks on the situation during a Monday address, blaming Afhgan political leadership for the government’s collapse to insurgent forces.

“I will not repeat the mistakes we’ve made in the past,” he said.

“We have made it clear to the Taliban: if they attack our personnel, or disrupt our operation, the US presence will be swift and the response will be swift and forceful,” Biden continued in his address.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Donald Trump did not appear to donate his salary from his last 6 months in office as promised, says report

Donald Trump
Former President Donald Trump.

  • Donald Trump promised to give away his presidential salary while in office.
  • The Washington Post was unable to account for his salary for his final 6 months.
  • Trump had become increasingly bitter about not receiving praise for donating his earnings.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

It is unclear what Donald Trump did with his salary from his last 6 months in office, which he promised to donate, according to The Washington Post.

While in office Donald Trump pledged to give away all of his $400,000 annual presidential salary. For the first three and a half of his presidency, he donated the money to federal agencies.

The Washington Post said it surveyed all major federal agencies and none reported receiving anything from Trump after a gift in July 2020.

The paper said it could not account for the the last $220,000 of his salary.

During the campaign trail in 2015 Donald Trump said that he would not accept a presidential salary if elected. The Constitution does not allow a president to forgo a salary, so Trump chose to donate his earnings to federal agencies instead.

While in office he donated $100,000 quarterly payments to federal departments such as the Department of Veterans and the Department of Health and Human Services.

His last known gift was to the National Park Service on July 23, 2020, according to government documents.

Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold said that Trump had become increasingly bitter about not getting praise for donating his salary.

At a campaign rally in Arizona in October 2020 Trump said, “I’m the only president that did not accept a salary, which surprised me. It’s $450,000. The only reason I mention it is they never talk about it.”

Trump frequently claimed that no other president had ever refused their salary, which is untrue. Both Herbert Hoover and John F. Kennedy did the same.

Trump also got his salary amount wrong. The president receives $400,000 annually.

Despite donating his salary, Trump still continued to make money from his various businesses while in office. According to one review, Trump made $1.6 billion while he was president, meaning his donated salary accounted for 0.1% of his earnings.

The Washington Post clarified that their inability to account for his final 6 months of salary did not mean he definitely did not donate it. However, the lack of confirmation is unusual, and a marked difference from his first 3 and a half years in office.

The paper said it also asked Trump’s business, and the former lawyer who helped arrange the donations, about the money, and neither responded.

Trump continues to receive a presidential pension of more than $220,000 a year.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Israeli military-grade spy software was used to hack phones of journalists, activists, executives, and 2 women connected to murdered journalist Jamal Khashoggi, a report says

Woman holds phone outside NSO Group in Herzliya
An Israeli woman uses her iPhone in front of the building housing the Israeli NSO group, on August 28, 2016, in Herzliya, near Tel Aviv.

  • Military-grade spyware technology was used to hack the smartphones of journalists, activists, and executives, The Washington Post reported.
  • Some of the affected journalists worked at outlets including CNN and The New York Times.
  • The 37 numbers appeared on a list of 50,000 phone numbers in countries with a history of conducting surveillance on their own citizens, according to the report.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Military-grade spyware technology software created by an Israeli company that sells it to governments for the purpose of countering terrorism and criminal activity was used to target the smartphones of 37 journalists, activists, and business executives, the Washington Post reported Sunday.

The investigation was conducted by the Post and 16 other media partners, according to the report.

Among those who were the subject of attempted smartphone hacking, which used software called Pegasus, include journalists working at CNN, the Associated Press, the New York Times. the Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, and Voice of America in the US. Targets also included journalists working for Le Monde in France, the Financial Times in London, and Al Jazeera in Qatar, according to the Post report.

Two women connected to the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was murdered in October 2018 in a Saudi consulate in Istanbul, were also on the list, according to the report.

The 37 numbers appeared on a list of 50,000 phone numbers originating mostly from countries with a history of conducting surveillance on their own citizens and those who have a relationship with the Israeli cyber-surveillance firm NSO Group, which created and sells the Pegasus software, according to the Post.

The list was shared with media outlets by the Paris-based non-profit Forbidden Stories and by Amnesty International, according to the report.

The list does not identify who placed the numbers on it. More than 15,000 of the phone numbers on the list were from Mexico while another sizable chunk of numbers came from the Middle Eastern countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Yemen, according to the Post.

Read the full story at The Washington Post

Read the original article on Business Insider

Biden says it’s ‘simply wrong’ to allow the DOJ to seize phone records and emails from reporters

Biden
President Joe Biden

  • President Joe Biden told CNN he would not allow the DOJ to seize records from reporters.
  • His remarks come after reports said the DOJ covertly obtained email and phone records from journalists with The Washington Post and CNN.
  • Biden condemned the practice, calling it “simply wrong.”
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

President Joe Biden on Friday condemned the government seizing phone and email records from reporters.

He told CNN he would not permit the Department of Justice to do so while he’s president, calling the practice “simply wrong.”

“I will not let that happen,” he said.

His comments come after reports saying the Justice Department covertly obtained records from multiple reporters at The Washington Post and CNN.

Earlier this month, The Washington Post reported that the Justice Department under the Trump administration pulled phone records from several of its journalists who were investigating Russia’s influence in the 2016 elections.

The DOJ notified three of its reporters “that pursuant to legal process the United States Department of Justice received toll records … for the period from April 15, 2017 to July 31, 2017.” These records included their personal, work, and home phone numbers.

And just this week, CNN reported its Pentagon correspondent, Barbara Starr, was informed in a similar fashion that the Justice Department had seized her phone records.

The DOJ obtained Starr’s personal and work email, as well as her phone records, between June 1, 2017, and July 31, 2017. Starr was notified that the records had been seized after a court had approved the action.

As long as the attorney general approves the request, prosecutors are able to obtain records from journalists without their knowledge through the court system. Prosecutors must also demonstrate that the records are related or potentially useful to “extraordinary” circumstances like national security threats, CNN reported.

It’s unclear what the Trump administration was looking for in obtaining Starr’s records.

The longstanding and controversial practice of federal investigators secretly seizing records from journalists, under the scope of leak investigations, was widely used by the Obama administration and favored by the Trump administration as well.

Biden’s Friday comments against the action mark the strongest stance against the practice from his administration.

Hours before Biden gave his direct remarks, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said ultimately, the Justice Department would have the final say.

“This President is committed, strongly, to the rights of the freedom of press as you’ve seen for decades, and standing up for the rights of journalists,” Psaki said. “And the Justice Department conveyed yesterday that they intend to meet with reporters to hear their concerns about recent notices.”

“They certainly intend to use the Holder model as their model, not the model of the last several years, but really these decisions would be up to the Justice Department,” Psaki added, referencing former Obama administration Attorney General Eric Holder.

The Justice Department did not immediately return Insider’s request for comment.

Insider’s Azmi Haroun contributed to this report.

Read the original article on Business Insider