Trump administration lawyers connected to his most controversial policies are struggling to find new jobs, report says

Trump lawyers
Former White House counsel Pat Cipollone, bottom left in a red tie, and Trump’s personal lawyer Jay Sekulow listen as President Donald Trump speaks at the White House in February 2020.

  • Some of the Trump administration’s top lawyers are struggling to find jobs, Bloomberg reported.
  • More than 80% of the lawyers got some kind of work in recent months, even if it’s just part-time.
  • However, some of the top lawyers are finding that the process of landing a job much more difficult.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Top lawyers who worked for the Trump administration are having a hard time finding new positions compared to those who served in previous administrations, Bloomberg reported this week.

According to a list compiled by Bloomberg Law, more than 80% of the lawyers who worked under the former president have managed to nab a job somewhere, even if their roles are only part-time or not their first choice.

However, some of them – including former Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and former Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer – still appear to be without a job months after Trump has left office.

Read more: Tension is building between Biden’s White House and the Justice Department. They have Trump to thank for that.

Lauren Drake, a partner at search firm Macrae, told Bloomberg that the lawyers who seem to be finding it more difficult to find jobs are those who are either connected to Trump’s most controversial policies or are lacking experience.

Ken Cuccinelli, who served as Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, agreed that those coming out of the Trump administration are facing more “discrimination.”

“I don’t think anyone coming out of the George W. Bush administration was told, ‘We can’t hire this person,'” Cuccinelli said, according to Bloomberg. “I’m sure Jan. 6 made it that much worse than it ever would have been.”

Cuccinelli also said he had a recent job opportunity slip through his fingers because they “just decided they didn’t want Trump people,” according to Bloomberg.

“It was just flat out – you can call it Trump discrimination,” he said.

Cuccinelli did not name the company in question. He is currently acting as the National Chairman of the Election Transparency Initiative,

Former Attorney General William Barr is also among those who still haven’t found full-time jobs. A person familiar with the matter told Bloomberg Law last month that the former attorney is finishing writing a book before he even considers the next steps in his career.

The lawyers are not the only ones struggling with finding work post-Trump presidency.

According to a Washington Post report published two months ago, former Trump aides are unable to score the lucrative and prestigious Washington jobs they’d hoped for.

Matt Schlapp, the chairman of the American Conservative Union who’s raked in millions lobbying the Trump White House, told The Post at the time: “If I had a dollar for every time someone in Washington said to me, hey, I’m really looking to hire someone for X job, but they can’t have worked for the Trump administration, I’d have a great sum of money.”

Read the original article on Business Insider

With a backlog of over 1.3 million cases, the 500 immigration judges in the US feel overburdened and pressured to deport

GettyImages 987106496
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) special agent preparing to arrest alleged immigration violators at Fresh Mark in Salem, Ohio, June 19, 2018.

  • Immigration lawyers are overburdened as they deal with 1.3 million backlogged cases.
  • Many are fighting for the ability to rule independently without political pressure, NBC News.
  • Former AG Bill Barr worked to decertify the union that protected them.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

The country’s 500 immigration judges feel overburdened and under pressure to deport as more than 1.3 million cases have been backlogged at the end of the last administration and crossings into the country keep rising, NBC News reported.

While federal trial judges are appointed for life, making it easier to make independent decisions, immigration judges are appointed and answer to the attorney general.

The ability for the judges to rule independently on asylum cases has also been compromised by a move from former Attorney General Bill Barr to decertify the National Association of Immigration Judges.

“We are in the legal fight for our life to ensure that our decisional independence is valued and maintained,” Judge Amiena Khan told NBC.

Sixty Democrats in the House and some on the Senate Judiciary Committee have also called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to recertified the union and allow judges to speak freely about immigration cases, The Hill reported.

As the union fights to be recertified, judges have said they are fighting to be able to make rulings independently.

“We should not be used as a tool of law enforcement,” Judge Dana Leigh Marks told NBC. “That is not how Congress envisioned the immigration courts should play a role in the immigration system.”

In a press release, the American Immigration Lawyers Association said the wait time for the backlogged cases was more than four years, including “cases that require urgent attention, such as those seeking asylum and humanitarian relief.”

Additionally, cases keep rising. In May alone, Customs and Border Protection reported more than 180,000 migrants at the Southern border, the largest number in a month in more than 20 years.

Marks told NBC quotes were imposed to get cases through faster but the measure threatens to ensure every case has due process and doesn’t allow migrants time to find a lawyer. Migrants aren’t given court-appointed lawyers and without a lawyer, they will most likely lose their case.

Read the original article on Business Insider

The power players of the booming litigation finance industry

Headshots of Ralph Sutton, Aviva Will, Brandon Baier, and Stuart Grant on a background of gavels and dollar bills
From left: Ralph Sutton, Aviva Will, Brandon Baer, and Stuart Grant.

  • Litigation funders now have $11.3 billion invested or ready to invest in US commercial litigation.
  • Heavy-hitting players include hedge funds like Fortress Investment Group and D.E. Shaw & Co.
  • Insider interviewed dozens of experts to find out the people and firms supercharging the industry.

Paying for someone else’s lawsuit used to be illegal. Now it’s a multibillion-dollar opportunity.

Today, litigation funders have $11.3 billion invested or ready to invest in US commercial litigation, according to a recent estimate by Westfleet Advisors. Westfleet estimates there are at least 46 litigation funders active in the US market.

Heavy-hitting industry players include hedge funds like Fortress Investment Group and D.E. Shaw & Co. Bankers at Stifel and Jefferies have also worked on legal-industry deals. And some of the biggest funders have formed a trade group, the International Legal Finance Association, meant to be a counterweight to groups like the US Chamber of Commerce that would like to see more regulation of their industry.

Insider spoke with dozens of funders, lawyers, and finance professionals to find out who’s shaping the booming litigation finance industry.

Read the full list of power players here:

The bankers, brokers, and big money transforming litigation finance from a lawyer’s hustle to a multibillion-dollar asset class

Read the original article on Business Insider

Meet the power players of the booming litigation finance industry

Headshots of Ralph Sutton, Aviva Will, Brandon Baier, and Stuart Grant on a background of gavels and dollar bills
From left: Ralph Sutton, Aviva Will, Brandon Baer, and Stuart Grant.

  • Litigation funders now have $11.3 billion invested or ready to invest in US commercial litigation.
  • Heavy-hitting players include hedge funds like Fortress Investment Group and D.E. Shaw & Co.
  • Insider interviewed dozens of experts to find out the people and firms supercharging the industry.

Paying for someone else’s lawsuit used to be illegal. Now it’s a multibillion-dollar opportunity.

Today, litigation funders have $11.3 billion invested or ready to invest in US commercial litigation, according to a recent estimate by Westfleet Advisors. Westfleet estimates there are at least 46 litigation funders active in the US market.

Heavy-hitting industry players include hedge funds like Fortress Investment Group and D.E. Shaw & Co. Bankers at Stifel and Jefferies have also worked on legal-industry deals. And some of the biggest funders have formed a trade group, the International Legal Finance Association, meant to be a counterweight to groups like the US Chamber of Commerce that would like to see more regulation of their industry.

Insider spoke with dozens of funders, lawyers, and finance professionals to find out who’s shaping the booming litigation finance industry.

Read the full list of power players here:

The bankers, brokers, and big money transforming litigation finance from a lawyer’s hustle to a multibillion-dollar asset class

Read the original article on Business Insider

The bankers, brokers, and big money transforming litigation finance from a lawyer’s hustle to a multibillion-dollar asset class

Headshots of Ralph Sutton, Aviva Will, Brandon Baier, and Stuart Grant on a background of gavels and dollar bills
From left: Ralph Sutton, Aviva Will, Brandon Baer, and Stuart Grant.

  • Litigation finance is growing, with a reported $11 billion invested or ready to invest in lawsuits.
  • What was once a niche industry is now swarmed with consultants, bankers, and public companies.
  • We spoke to over 25 funders, lawyers, and finance professionals to learn who’s shaping the field.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Paying for someone else’s lawsuit used to be illegal. Now it’s a multibillion-dollar opportunity.

Commercial litigation funders make money by advancing money to businesses that lack the resources or the patience for a lawsuit. In return, they get a multiple of what they invested (often double or triple) or a return anchored to an interest rate. Litigation funders now have $11.3 billion invested or ready to invest in US commercial litigation, according to a recent estimate by Westfleet Advisors.

The original litigation financiers in the US were often plaintiffs’ lawyers, whose contingency-fee model – “no fee unless we win” – is a form of self-funding. A simple slip and fall might net just a $10,000 fee, but complex and risky cases can be lucrative; the lawyers hired by states to sue tobacco companies in the 1990s made billions.

Today, litigation finance is much more specialized, even corporate. While funders still back large groups of little guys, like drivers who bought a dirty diesel from Volkswagen or shops that say Visa and Mastercard charged excessive fees, they also cut deals with big businesses, like supermarket chains that overpaid for broiler chickens and manufacturers that believe their trade secrets have been stolen.

“This asset class is growing and maturing and becoming an accepted part of the litigation industry,” said Bill Farrell, a managing director at Longford Capital, a private-litigation funder.

Westfleet Advisors, the source of the $11.3 billion estimate, has said there are at least 46 litigation funders active in the US market.

Heavy-hitting industry players include hedge funds like Fortress Investment Group and D.E. Shaw & Co. Bankers at Stifel and Jefferies have also worked on legal-industry deals. And some of the biggest funders have formed a trade group, the International Legal Finance Association, meant to be a counterweight to groups like the US Chamber of Commerce that would like to see more regulation of their industry.

Commercial-litigation finance is fraught with risk. In many cases, the money is nonrecourse, meaning that if a case is unsuccessful, investors suffer a total loss. But many funders have made investments in portfolios of cases, in which a win against one adversary can offset a loss against another. And some companies specialize in making loans to law firms that are backed by guarantees, though such companies aren’t the focus of this article.

Since 2020, Insider has spoken with dozens of funders, lawyers, and finance professionals about the commercial-litigation finance industry, with a focus on the US and on investments in categories other than patent litigation. Below are some of the companies and individuals they singled out for their influence and savvy.

Billion-dollar behemoths

Aviva Will, co-chief operating officer of Burford Capital.
Aviva Will, co-chief operating officer of Burford Capital.

Burford Capital, which reported a $4.5 billion portfolio in its last annual report, is one of the top dogs in litigation finance. It pursues a mix of strategies, funding single cases and groups of cases while also cutting deals directly with corporations that might have large legal claims but lack the bandwidth to pursue them. Its co-chief operating officer Aviva Will is involved with underwriting major deals, with support from a large staff with expertise in insurance, IP, and other areas.

One of Burford’s biggest cases is the so-called Peterson case, which started as a claim against the Argentinian government that Burford paid €15 million ($18 million) to acquire. Its value has risen as the case has progressed, and the company sold 10% of the claim for $100 million in 2019. Burford has also been targeted by the short-seller Muddy Waters.

Omni Bridgeway, with locations around the globe, manages about AU$2.2 billion ($1.7 billion), according to its most recent annual report. With roots in Australia, it still has major cases there, like a firefighting-foam contamination case that settled for AU$213 million ($167 million) last year. But it also has dozens of employees in the US, including Jim Batson in New York and Matthew Harrison in San Francisco. Chief Investment Officer Allison Chock gets involved in big deals.

Eric Blinderman of Therium Capital Management.
Eric Blinderman of Therium Capital Management.

Therium Capital Management is another major funder, though unlike Burford and Omni, it isn’t publicly traded. It says it’s raised $1.1 billion, including a £325 million ($460 million) raise in 2019 from institutional investors and an unspecified sovereign wealth fund. While its work in the US is somewhat under wraps, it has worked on several major cases in Europe, including funding claims against Volkswagen in its 2015 emissions scandal.

Neil Purslow runs the group, and Eric Blindermann runs the Therium Inc. team in the US. He said the US investments run the gamut, from a recent $5 million investment in an antitrust lawsuit to a $10 million-plus investment in a portfolio of insurance cases brought by a major international law firm.

Ellora MacPherson of Harbour Litigation Funding.
Ellora MacPherson of Harbour Litigation Funding.

Harbour Litigation Funding is well known in its base in Europe, but it has been looking for opportunities in the US, which amounts for about 10% of its investment portfolio, according to Chief Investment Officer Ellora Macpherson. The company, which is privately held, says on its website that it has raised more than $1.5 billion and has financed litigation against Uber in Australia, arbitration against Italy’s government and numerous shareholder lawsuits around the world. Its US representative is Kory Parkhurst.

Longford Capital is another major player and has made headlines with an effort to team up with schools like the University of California, Santa Barbara to monetize the patents developed by its researchers. Longford has raised more than $1.1 billion, including $435 million earlier this year. A recent regulatory filing lists a Fund P with more than $119 million in gross assets whose existence hasn’t previously been reported. Bill Farrell, Tim Farrell and Michael Nicolas are its leaders.

Pure-play private funders

Stuart Grant of Bench Walk Advisors.
Stuart Grant of Bench Walk Advisors.

Bench Walk Advisors was cofounded in 2018 by Stuart Grant, a former lawyer at Skadden who also cofounded Grant & Eisenhofer, a top firm for shareholders litigation. Grant said in an interview with Reuters that he shifted focus to litigation finance after a few adverse court rulings because “I don’t like losing.” His litigation-funding shop claimed a 93% win rate as of the end of last year. It says it’s invested more than $300 million.

Brandon Baer of Contingency Capital
Brandon Baer of Contingency Capital.

Contingency Capital was launched in November by Brandon Baer, an experienced lender who co-led the legal-assets group at Fortress. While the firm is still new and not much about its activities are known, it’s minority-owned by TFG Asset Management, which manages $30.7 billion, and has coinvesting commitments from Fortress and an undisclosed fixed-income manager totaling $1.4 billion.

The team has recently grown with hires including Jeff Cohen from Southpaw Asset Management and Kacey Wolmer, who joined from FirstKey Mortgage.

From left to right, Adam Gill, Jamison Lynch and David Spiegel of litigation funder GLS Capital.
From left: Adam Gill, Jamison Lynch and David Spiegel of GLS Capital.

GLS Capital is a relatively new firm run by familiar faces. Adam Gill, Jamison Lynch, and David Spiegel, its three managing partners, got their start at Gerchen Keller Capital, which was sold to Burford for $160 million in 2016. Several people listed on the firm’s website have backgrounds in pharmaceuticals and life sciences, where disputes involving licenses, patents, and other intellectual-property matters are common.

“We review deals anywhere between $1 million and $50 million in size,” Spiegel said. “Our sweet spot is between $5 million and $10 million.”

Lake Whillans, founded by Lee Drucker and Boaz Weinstein, is also cited as a major player. Said by one observer to be “comfortable with more distressed, hairy situations,” the company raised $125 million in late 2017. At least one of its cases has been publicly disclosed: a $5 million stake in a case brought by Cel-Sci, a drug developer.

Eva Shang of Legalist.
Eva Shang of Legalist.

Legalist has funded commercial claims and mass-tort litigation. The company, run by the Harvard dropout Eva Shang, has emphasized its use of analytics to identify investment opportunities. Shang has said its investments average $500,000 apiece, smaller than those made by other funders.

LexShares, run by Jay Greenberg, has also emphasized a data-driven approach, using a program it calls the “Diamond Mine” to find investment opportunities in court filings. The company courts individual investors as well as institutions and announced last year that it was raising an additional $100 million to invest in cases.

Aaron Katz and Howie Shams of Parabellum Capital.
Aaron Katz and Howie Shams of Parabellum Capital.

Parabellum Capital is run by Howie Shams and Aaron Katz, two veterans of Credit Suisse’s legal-risk strategies and finance unit, one of the earliest involvements by a mainstream financial institution in the litigation-funding space. Its Form ADV lists more than $666 million in discretionary regulatory assets under management as of the end of 2020 and says its investments tend to range from $2 million to $15 million depending on whether it’s investing in a smaller single case or a larger portfolio. Parabellum is one of a subset of funders that also invests in patent litigation.

Ralph Sutton of Validity Finance.
Ralph Sutton of Validity Finance.

Validity Finance is led by Ralph Sutton, another alumni of Credit Suisse’s early venture. The firm, which was set up with $250 million from TowerBrook Capital Partners, said last year that it has deployed $125 million across a range of court cases and arbitrations and raised another $100 million.

Mainstream investors

David Gallagher and Sarah Johnson, the leaders of D.E. Shaw & Co.'s litigation finance unit.
David Gallagher and Sarah Johnson, the leaders of D.E. Shaw & Co.’s litigation finance unit.

D.E. Shaw’s litigation-funding team is led jointly by David Gallagher, an alumnus of one of Omni Bridgeway’s predecessor companies, and Sarah Johnson, who has spent 15 years in D.E. Shaw’s corporate credit unit. The team’s “sweet spot” is investments of $20 million to $50 million, according to the company, and it focuses on quick decisions and flexible terms.

The Fortress team is led by Jack Neumark, with Joe Dunn described by some people as his right-hand man. (The firm has also been involved in high-stakes patent disputes, but a different team led by Eran Zur handles those deals.) While Fortress has directly funded some high-stakes disputes and bought litigation claims, it’s also been known to extend credit to other litigation funders, including Vannin Capital.

Tenor Capital has $5.4 billion and has used some of that money to back several mining companies in their claims against foreign governments. Led since 2004 by Robin Shah, a JPMorgan alumnus, with Blair Wallace, formerly of Och Ziff, managing a portfolio of litigation, the firm has backed Crystallex, which is trying to seize Citgo in order to collect a $1.2 billion award against Venezuela; Eco Oro, which has sued Colombia; and Gabriel Resources, which seeks to hold Romania liable for scuttling its operations there.

The brokers and bankers

Westfleet Advisors and its founder, Charles Agee, are one of two names that regularly spring from the lips of lawyers and funders in the litigation-finance industry. He and his colleagues Gretchen Lowe and Barry Kamar connect claimants, lawyers, and investors. They also regularly conduct and publish surveys of the industry.

Andrew Langhoff is also regularly cited as a trusted source of perspective and opportunities by people in the industry. A former Big Law litigator who went on to hold roles at Burford and at Gerchen Keller, Langhoff now runs Red Bridges Advisors.

Stifel Financial made headlines in 2019 when it hired Justin Brass and Sarah Lieber from Jeffries. Brass, a former bankruptcy lawyer, and Lieber, who worked for an insurer after years at Jones Day, are both Burford alumni. While many commentators said a lack of standardization has made litigation-finance investments hard to flip, Stifel said Brass and Lieber have syndicated more than $1 billion in litigation investments since joining in 2019.

“If I’m playing checkers, they’re really playing three-dimensional chess,” one lawyer who’s worked with them said.

Read the original article on Business Insider