AOC mocked lawmakers who prioritize the filibuster over the Green New Deal by sharing videos of New York City underwater amid a torrential downpour

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) attending a vote on January 9, 2020.

  • Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shared videos of flooding in New York to call out lawmakers against the Green New Deal.
  • “I’m so glad the filibuster is here to fix this oh wait,” she tweeted Thursday.
  • Last week, Ocasio-Cortez also pointed to a video of the Gulf of Mexico on fire to evidence a need to fund her environment proposal.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez clapped back at lawmakers who opposed her legislation to combat the climate crisis while sharing harrowing videos of flooding in New York City.

New York state and New Jersey faced torrential downpours as Tropical Storm Elsa makes its way up the northeast coast, leading to flooded streets and underground subway stations.

The congresswoman from New York shared a video of commuters wading in waist-deep water in subway stations, calling out lawmakers who are against her Green New Deal proposal.

“‘The Green New Deal, which is a blueprint to create millions of good jobs rebuilding infrastructure to stem climate change & protect vulnerable communities, is unrealistic,'” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Thursday with a video. “‘Instead we will do the adult thing, which is take orders from fossil fuel execs &make (sic) you swim to work.'”

Ocasio-Cortez appeared to be referencing a leaked secret video in which a senior Exxon lobbyist said the company attempted to weaken President Joe Biden’s climate agenda by engaging in climate denialism through so-called “shadow groups” and targeted influential lawmakers to manipulate public opinion on the ongoing climate crisis, The New York Times reported.

In a follow-up tweet with a video of the Major Deegan Expressway in New York City underwater, Ocasio-Cortez wrote: “I’m so glad the filibuster is here to fix this oh wait.”

The threat of a GOP filibuster looms over Biden’s infrastructure deal, which incorporates initiatives focused on combatting the climate crisis. The deal is currently on two tracks – one that bypasses the filibuster through budget reconciliation and requires a simple majority (50 Democrats plus the vice president) to. pass, and the other bipartisan track that could likely end up with more than 60 “yes” votes to withstand the filibuster.

This isn’t the first time the progressive congresswoman called out those who are resistant to addressing the climate crisis. Last week, she pointed to a shocking video of the Gulf of Mexico on fire after an oil pipeline rupture as evidence of a need to fund the Green New Deal.

“Shout out to all the legislators going out on dinner dates with Exxon lobbyists so they can say a Green New Deal is too expensive,” she tweeted with a thumbs-up emoji.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Marjorie Taylor Green says she’s ready to debate AOC after initially admitting that she had not read ‘all 14 pages’ of the Green New Deal

marjorie taylor greene alexandria ocasio-cortez
MTG has challenged AOC to a debate on pay-per-view TV over the Green New Deal.

Now that she’s done the required reading, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene says she’s ready for a Green New Deal showdown with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.

The Georgia lawmaker made headlines Wednesday when she admitted she hadn’t read “all 14 pages” of the climate legislation of which she’s been a vocal critic.

But in a Thursday tweet, Greene said she has now read the 14-page resolution, which she called ” a Communist manifesto,” and said she was looking forward to debating Ocasio-Cortez.

In a video acquired by Right Wing Watch, Greene explained how the proposed debate with Ocasio-Cortez came to be.

“[Ocasio-Cortez] asked me if I had read her 14-page Green New Deal. I said I’ve read some of it,” Greene said. “And she said ‘well, when you read all of it, then you can challenge me to a debate.'”

“Well, the good news is I’ve read all 14 little pages and I’m very ready to debate her on the House floor,” Greene said in the video.

“If she chickens out then she shows exactly who she is – a scared little girl that is pretty stupid and doesn’t know anything about the economy or economics,” Greene said in the video.

Greene had previously tweeted a photo of her and Ocasio-Cortez talking on the House Floor Wednesday, saying she was glad she ran into the New York lawmaker so they could plan their debate on the resolution.

The Georgia lawmaker has been pushing for a pay-per-view TV debate with the New York congressman on the climate change proposal.

Representatives for Greene and Ocasio-Cortez did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for comment.

Democratic lawmakers, including Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey, reintroduced the Green New Deal resolution Tuesday. The non-binding resolution, which was first introduced in February 2019, offers a ten-year plan to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions in the US, reduce pollution, and transition the country’s economy toward one that does not rely on fossil fuels.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Marjorie Taylor Green is gunning for a debate with AOC over the Green New Deal – but admits she hasn’t actually read ‘all 14 pages’ of it yet

marjorie taylor greene alexandria ocasio-cortez
Marjorie Taylor Greene has challenged AOC to a debate on pay-per-view TV over the Green New Deal.

  • Marjorie Taylor Greene says she will debate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the Green New Deal – after she reads “all 14 pages” of the document.
  • AOC has not confirmed this debate is happening, but the two were pictured chatting on the House floor on Wednesday.
  • Greene tweeted last week that she wanted the debate to be aired on pay-per-view TV, and for the profits to be split between them.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Georgia lawmaker Marjorie Taylor Greene says she will debate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the Green New Deal – but only after she reads “all 14 pages” of it.

Greene tweeted she was “glad” to run into AOC and that they would “schedule time” for the debate after she reads the 14-page Green New Deal document.

AOC has not confirmed this debate, but the two were pictured chatting on the House floor on Wednesday – nor has she publicly responded to Greene.

Insider has reached out to both Green and Ocasio-Cortez for comment.

Greene has been pushing for a debate on pay-per-view TV with the New York congresswoman, during which she plans to duke it out with Ocasio-Cortez over the climate change proposal.

In a series of tweets on April 14, Greene said the debate would be “informative for the American people” and suggested that she and Ocasio-Cortez “negotiate a major news network to host the debate,” with each of them choosing one moderator.

“Since you sponsored the Green New Deal and have a degree in Economics, I’m sure you are more than qualified,” Greene wrote.

She added that she, too, has qualifications of her own, tweeting: “I just have a degree in business admin and have owned a construction company for 20 years.”

As for where monetary earnings from the pay-per-view debate would go, Greene also suggested they could split the money raised.

Democratic legislators – including Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey – re-introduced the Green New Deal resolution on Tuesday.

The non-binding resolution, first introduced in February 2019, offers a ten-year plan to eliminate the US’s greenhouse gas emissions, reduce pollution, and transition America’s economy toward one that does not rely on fossil fuels.

Greene has been a vocal critic of AOC and the Green New Deal. In February, at a Murray County, Georgia, town hall, she argued: “Maybe perhaps we live on a ball that rotates around the sun, that flies through the universe, and maybe our climate just changes.”

There is a 97% consensus among the scientific community that humans are the cause of climate change.

Greene also previously posited that the California wildfires were not caused by climate change but by space lasers funded by Jewish investment firms, a claim that was blasted for being inaccurate and antisemitic.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Biden advisors reportedly plan $3 trillion more spending on infrastructure, universal pre-K, climate-change initiatives

President Joe Biden.

  • Joe Biden’s economic advisors are drafting a proposal to recommend $3 trillion more spending.
  • The New York Times reports the White House could split its colossal infrastructure plan in two.
  • The first part would focus on infrastructure and climate. The second may set up universal pre-K.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Instead of pushing a single colossal spending bill through Congress, President Joe Biden’s advisors are reportedly expected to present a proposal this week that includes $3 trillion in spending aimed at boosting the economy and fighting climate change through separate legislative pieces.

The New York Times first reported that Biden’s economic advisors plan to recommend as much as $3 trillion to narrow economic inequality, reduce carbon emissions, and improve American manufacturing, beginning with an infrastructure bill. They cited people familiar with the plan, along with documents outlining its provisions.

The documents said the proposed package would spend heavily on infrastructure improvements, with nearly $1 trillion in spending alone for roads, bridges, electric vehicles, and more.

The second plan would be people-focused and spend heavily on education and programs to increase the participation of women in the labor force, including free community college, universal pre-K education, and a national paid leave program. Those elements are targeted at encouraging people to reenter the workforce and strengthen the overall economic recovery.

Administration officials said that while details on funding for the package are not yet determined, it might be financed by tax increases on the wealthy. Biden has already indicated that he would include a federal tax hike on high earners in his next big economic package, which would be the first major federal tax hike in nearly three decades.

Insider’s Juliana Kaplan reported Monday that Biden is likely to look at tweaks to the current tax code, instead of a new tax targeting wealth.

But whether Republicans will support one big bill, or a series of legislative pieces, depends largely on funding, and Republican lawmakers have already indicated they will not support a tax hike on the rich.

“I don’t think there’s going to be any enthusiasm on our side for a tax increase,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters last week. The Republican opposition to tax increases could prompt Democrats to bypass the GOP using reconciliation, the same tactic used to enact the $1.9 trillion stimulus law, but passing it more piecemeal could win bipartisan approval for certain aspects of the spending.

Groups of lawmakers from both parties have already met with Biden to discuss an upcoming infrastructure bill.

Democrats, like Rep. Peter DeFazio, the chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, suggested using reconciliation in a CNBC interview to pass the next bill, but Rep. Sam Graves, ranking member of the House infrastructure panel, said in a statement that it “cannot be a ‘my way or the highway’ approach like last Congress.”

Moderate Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin said in an “Axios on HBO” interview that an infrastructure bill could be as large as $4 trillion if it’s funded by tax hikes but that he would not support reconciliation.

“I’m not going to do it through reconciliation,” Manchin said. “I am not going to get on a bill that cuts them [Republicans] out completely before we start trying.”

The White House did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for comment.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Biden’s stimulus shows he’s governing like Bernie

joe biden bernie sanders
Joe Biden greets Sen. Bernie Sanders before the Democratic presidential primary debate at Drake University on January 14, 2020 in Des Moines, Iowa.

  • The House just passed the $1.9 trillion stimulus bill, sending it to Biden’s desk to be made law.
  • The package provides direct relief to workers and families in ways that could cut child poverty.
  • In these and other ways, it’s positively Bernie-esque – even though it comes from President Biden.
  • Visit the Business section of Insider for more stories.

The historic $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan just passed the House of Representatives for a second time, sending it to President Joe Biden’s desk to be made law as soon as this week.

The package is the first major legislation of Biden’s presidency – and it enjoys widespread support. A new Morning Consult poll found that 75% of voters support the package, including 59% of Republicans. In fact, poll after poll has shown the popularity of going big with the package.

The elements of the package that make it so popular are strikingly similar to policies long favored by one of America’s most popular senators: Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

Since he emerged as a serious candidate for president in 2016, Sanders has loudly advocated for the United States to join the ranks of developed countries that have embraced social democracy.

The stimulus is chock-full of social-democratic ideas: Putting cash into Americans’ pockets, beefing up their unemployment benefits, and providing a child tax credit, to name just a few.

Although Sanders defines himself as a Democratic Socialist, there’s a big difference between “socialism” and social democracy, as the developed countries Sanders admires so much include pro-market democracies, often Scandinavian ones.

“I think we should look to countries like Denmark, like Sweden and Norway, and learn what they have accomplished for their working people,” Sanders said in a 2016 CNN debate.

The final American Rescue Plan does indeed echo some of those countries.

So it’s not surprising then that Sanders has thrown his support behind the legislation, calling it the “the most significant piece of legislation to benefit working families in the modern history of this country” in a tweet.

What’s so historic about this stimulus?

Throughout the 2020 campaign, Biden inspired comparisons to (and name-checked) another president who took office during a massive, unprecedented downturn: Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

In fact, FDR’s “New Deal” agenda of the 1930s was a sea change in American politics, injecting the government into American life in unprecedented ways. But it stopped short of establishing a modern welfare state along the lines of those that emerged in Western Europe. Democrats tried again under President Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” of the 1960s, but that also fell short of the party’s dreams amid social unrest and the Vietnam War.

Sanders, now the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, has led a generation of progressives in seeking to rekindle FDR-sized ambitions in the party. At least one economist has called for a “New New Deal” to address the pandemic’s recession and economic devastation. It’s not the first time the New Deal has been evoked in modern politics. Leading progressive Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez named her plan to address climate change the “Green New Deal.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez hold a news conference to introduce legislation to transform public housing as part of their Green New Deal proposal outside the Capitol November 14, 2019 in Washington, DC.

With his stimulus, Biden promised to “go big.” The resulting bill spends money a lot like Sanders’ beloved Scandinavian countries.

It includes a one-year provision to expand the child tax credit, where parents could receive up to $3,600 per child. The Democrats want to distribute that in monthly checks.

As Insider’s Hillary Hoffower and Joseph Zeballos-Roig reported, that measure could be key in halving child poverty – and revolutionize the government’s relationship with parents. Some Democrats want to make it permanent. Biden is one of them.

For some Western European countries, that idea is already a reality: Germany and Sweden both have universal child benefits and Luxembourg boasts a monthly family allowance, while Denmark has a slightly lower quarterly one.

The bill also has funding for some of those who have been left behind or systemically excluded from prior economic policy (including the New Deal). It contains the largest-ever investment – $31.2 billion – for Native American communities, who have also been disproportionately impacted by the coronavirus pandemic.

Another provision, as reported by The Washington Post, is $5 billion to disadvantaged farmers, something Black farmers stand to benefit from.

An analysis from the Tax Policy Center found that the bill could ultimately give the poorest 20% of Americans a 20% boost in income.

Unemployment line
People line up outside Kentucky Career Center prior to its opening to find assistance with their unemployment claims in Frankfort, Kentucky, June 18, 2020.

Some major progressive initiatives are still missing from the package

A federal minimum wage hike (which would’ve been the first one since 2009) didn’t make it into the package. It’s something long championed by Sanders, and an issue Biden ran on as well, but Biden and Senate Democrats ultimately respected the parliamentarian’s decision not to include it in the Senate version of the bill.

There’s also the issue of student-loan debt relief. The legislation includes a tax exemption on student-loan forgiveness through 2025, which could set the stage for student loan forgiveness. But while leading Democrats – including Senator Elizabeth Warren – have called for $50,000 in student loan forgiveness, Biden has said he may cancel up to $10,000.

Chuck Schumer cancel student debt
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) speaks during a press conference about student debt outside the Capitol on February 4, 2021 in Washington, DC. Also pictured, L-R, Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-NY), Rep. Alma Adams (D-NC), Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA).

The package also contains an important provision for unemployment, extending it through September, but cutting it from $400 to $300.

While the bill doesn’t deliver on every progressive initiative, it shows a willingness to go big – and a potential shift in how Congress approaches spending.

Millions of Americans will no longer live in poverty because of the act, according to a new analysis from the Urban Institute. That study finds that the plan would reduce the projected annual poverty rate in 2021 by over a third – meaning that the number of Americans living in poverty would shrink by around 16 million people.

“This legislation is about giving the backbone of this nation – the essential workers, the working people who built this country, the people who keep this country going – a fighting chance,” Biden said in a statement.

He added: “On Friday, I look forward to signing the American Rescue Plan into law at the White House – a people’s law at the people’s house.”

Read the original article on Business Insider

Reliance on fossil fuels will lead to more energy disasters like Texas

texas storm
A Waco, Texas, resident clears snow from his driveway alongside his dog on February 17, 2021 as severe winter weather conditions over the last few days has forced road closures and power outages over the state.

  • The crisis in Texas exposed vulnerabilities in America’s energy system.
  •  Fossil fuels dependence makes our energy systems more vulnerable.
  • Local clean energy, efficiency and microgrids can make our energy
    system more resilient.
  • Johanna Neumann is the senior director of Environment America’s Campaign for 100% Renewable Energy.
  • This is an opinion column. The thoughts expressed are those of the author.
  • Visit the Business section of Insider for more stories.

Americans across the nation have been watching in horror as frigid conditions have cut power to millions of Texas homes and thrown people into desperate circumstances. They’re now wondering: Could that happen here?  

The answer is “yes.” Texas faced a similar winter energy crisis in 2011. Just last year, California cut power to millions of people to prevent wildfires sparked by live power lines. Floods and hurricanes have disrupted power supplies for many Americans in recent memory as well. 

The hard truth is that our energy system is more fragile than it should be. With climate change bringing more extreme weather, that’s only likely to get worse. In order to prevent a catastrophe, we need to fix three key vulnerabilities in our current system.

Energy resilience 

First, we’re dependent on too few centralized power plants that produce most of our energy, and we rely on transmission lines to carry it long distances to our homes. Problems with just a few of those power plants or transmission lines can quickly affect millions. 

Second, extreme weather events are becoming more frequent. The infrastructure we built 30 or 50 years ago isn’t equipped to handle more common or severe deep freezes in Texas, increasingly abundant wildfires in the West, or today’s wetter, more powerful hurricanes.

Third, our energy system’s dependence on fossil fuel is adding more climate change-causing pollution to our air, which will cause even more extreme weather in our future. And as the events in Texas showed, fossil fuels can be unreliable when you need them most.

What happened in Texas should be a wake-up call, and it must spur elected officials, regulators and utility companies to build a better and more resilient system. 

Preparing for the next Texas-sized disaster

What might a more resilient energy system look like? And how do we make this a reality?

 First, US communities need to produce more of our power locally, and redesign the grid so that problems in one area are less likely to cause outages far, far away. Rooftop solar, energy storage technologies such as batteries, electric vehicles, and community “microgrids” all have a role to play. 

Rooftop solar panels can be a difference-maker in extreme weather because they produce energy very close to where we use it. Meanwhile, more batteries in our garages, basements, or in our electric vehicles, allow us to store energy for later. Local energy generation also allows us to actually use much more of the power we produce, since at least 67% of the power we generate from fossil fuel power plants is lost through escaped heat and we lose even more when that power has to travel long distances over inefficient lines. 

Another way to build energy resilience is to use less energy in the first place. Energy efficiency improvements can reduce stress on the grid at times of high demand, and better-insulated homes, schools and offices are more comfortable in any weather. 

State leaders could cut energy waste by requiring utilities to hit energy-saving targets by helping their customers use power more wisely. The utilities can use a medley of approaches, including behavioral programs that put smiley faces on the bills of the most efficient customers, rebate programs for efficient appliances such as electric heat-pumps, and giving customers access to free energy audits, weatherization services and low-cost financing.

Paradoxically, even as we produce and store more of our energy locally, we should reinforce our ability to share electricity across the country. Texas’ standalone grid left it unable to receive sufficient help from other parts of the country as its own power plants were going offline. Even the most self-sufficient areas will need to get help sometimes – and that’s what good neighbors do.

From wildfire-ravaged California to hurricane-hit Puerto Rico, utility planners are learning from their experiences. They aren’t blindly replacing the same flawed centralized energy systems. Instead, they are deciding to daisy-chain together local microgrids, heavily powered by solar, which can function independently and as a network. Under this set-up, if there’s a problem in one area of one local network, it stays contained, and those who have surplus power can come to the aid of areas that have high demand. 

Let’s be clear: improving the resilience of our energy system also requires moving away from fossil fuels. Renewable energy is necessary to reduce the disruptive impact of climate change, and studies have shown that it is possible to build an energy system that runs on clean energy and keeps the lights on. And, unlike fuels such as gas and coal that are inherently finite, renewable energy sources will always, well, renew.

As 29 million people huddle in the cold in Texas trying to keep warm, governors, state lawmakers, and regulators should pay close attention to what went wrong, and recognize that simply doubling down on the same failed approaches that put the state at risk will only serve to set us up for the next disaster. A cleaner, safer, more resilient energy system is possible. With smart planning and decisions, we can make it a reality.

Johanna Neumann is the senior director of Environment America’s Campaign for 100% Renewable Energy. Environment America is a national network of 29 state environmental groups with members and supporters in every state.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Biden gives a nod to environmental ‘activists’ but doesn’t mention Green New Deal in message commemorating Paris Agreement

Joe Biden
President-elect Joe Biden speaks at The Queen theater in Wilmington, Del., Wednesday, Dec. 9, 2020.

  • President-elect Joe Biden appeared to acknowledge environmental “activists” in his statement commemorating the Paris Agreement but did not mention the Green New Deal.
  • “We’ll listen to and engage closely with the activists, including young people, who have continued to sound the alarm and demand change from those in power,” Biden said in a statement on Saturday.
  • Progressive lawmakers have pushed for the Biden administration to embrace parts of the Green New Deal, with the understanding that the Biden Administration has not fully adopted the plan.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

President-elect Joe Biden appeared to acknowledge environmental “activists” in his statement commemorating the five-year anniversary of the Paris Agreement but did not mention the Green New Deal.

Biden, in the statement released Saturday, reaffirmed that the US “will rejoin the Paris Agreement” when he steps into office and identified goals to address climate change and environmental issues, including achieving “net-zero emissions no later than 2050.”

“We’ll listen to and engage closely with the activists, including young people, who have continued to sound the alarm and demand change from those in power,” the statement said. 

The Green New Deal, introduced by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey last year, has been touted by progressives as a plan to address climate change, Business Insider’s Aylin Woodward reported. 

Although his statement referred to “activists,” Biden did not mention the Green New Deal, which has been rallied by young climate activists like those in the Sunrise Movement. The group last month protested alongside Ocasio-Cortez and Markey in front of the DNC headquarters pushing for the incoming Biden administration to keep his commitment to address climate change, The Guardian reported. 

A spokesperson for the Biden-Harris transition team did not immediately respond to Business Insider’s request for comment.

Prior to the election, Biden stopped short of fully adopting the “Green New Deal,” and instead noted in his plan for climate change that “the Green New Deal is a crucial framework for meeting the climate challenges we face.” Meanwhile, the “Biden-Harris plan” for climate change, shared on the Biden-Harris transition website, also makes no note of the Green New Deal. 

Progressive lawmakers have pushed for the Biden administration to embrace parts of the Green New Deal, with the understanding that the Biden Administration has not fully adopted the plan, Business Insider’s Tina Sfondeles, Elvina Nawaguna, and Robin Bravender reported. 

“Some elements have a good chance of passing,” Ocasio-Cortez said via her Instagram. “Others are a toss up (like ending fossil fuel subsidies) and others almost definitely won’t (for example GND makes a nod to Medicare for All.)”

Meanwhile, depending on the outcome of the upcoming Georgia senate runoffs, Biden could be the first president since George H.W. Bush to step into office without his party controlling both chambers of Congress.  Progressive climate activists have expressed skepticism that this may pose a barrier to implementing Biden’s climate agenda, Business Insider’s Eliza Relman reported.

Without that, the upper chamber would stay under GOP control, and “we don’t have the power of the purse in the same way,” a progressive climate activist told Business Insider.

Read the original article on Business Insider