OANN is doubling down on election conspiracy theories after Dominion threatened the network with a defamation lawsuit

OANN
Dominion Voting Systems has threatened to sue OAN, Newsmax, and Fox News for defamation.

  • Dominion Voting Systems sent letters to the One America News Network threatening to sue for defamation, accusing the network of spreading unsubstantiated conspiracy theories about the election-technology company.
  • OAN responded with letters of its own, asking Dominion to preserve certain documents concerning the election in order to help the network make its case if it ends up in court.
  • The requests reiterated some of the figures involved in the election conspiracy theories, including the former president of Venezuela Hugo Chávez and the billionaire investor and philanthropist George Soros.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

In response to threats of a defamation lawsuit, the One America News Network is leaning further into some election conspiracy theories that the network has featured on its shows.

Dominion Voting Systems previously sent OAN letters threatening to sue, accusing the network of spreading the unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that the election-technology company manipulated votes in favor of President-elect Joe Biden in the November general election.

Dominion also asked the network to save any documents or correspondence related to Dominion, Insider’s Jacob Shamsian previously reported.

In letters reviewed by Insider, OAN responded by requesting Dominion keep records of certain documents so the network can “preserve its own claims and defenses in the event of litigation.”

The conservative news network sent similar letters to Smartmatic, another election-technology company.

Supporters of President Donald Trump have alleged, without substantial evidence, that Dominion’s voting machines and Smartmatic’s voting software helped flipped votes from Trump to Biden. There are also groundless claims that Dominion has secret ties to Smartmatic.

The material OAN requested be preserved concerns that claim, as well as other baseless conspiracy theories that prompted Dominion’s lawsuit threats in the first place.

In the letters dated December 23, the list included voting software and hardware, communications about the 2020 election, digital and manual ballots, and the voting machines themselves.

In letters sent a day later, OAN requested the companies’ save any correspondence between Smartmatic CEO Antonio Mugica and a number of individuals, including former president of Venezuela Hugo Chávez and California Secretary of State Alex Padilla.

The president’s allies have also claimed without evidence that Smartmatic was working with the socialist Venezuelan government and Chávez, who died in 2013, to disrupt the US presidential election.

The list of material to preserve includes documents concerning George Soros, the billionaire investor and philanthropist who is a frequent target of right-wing conspiracy theorists.

In addition to OAN, Dominion has sent letters to Fox News and Newsmax with threats to sue for defamation, as well as conservative media figures like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, among others.

The company has also sent letters to some of Trump’s allies, including attorneys Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani.

Mugica, the Smartmatic CEO, has also said the company is considering pursuing lawsuits against Fox News, Newsmax, and OAN, for spreading the groundless claims, saying they have hurt his business.

Read the original article on Business Insider

A Pennsylvania Republican pretended to be his dead mom to vote for Trump. The Trump campaign blasted it as a case of voter fraud.

donald trump going like what are you fr
President Donald Trump talks to reporters in the Oval Office.

  • Pennsylvania resident Bruce Bartman has been charged with voter fraud for allegedly pretending to be his dead mother to cast an extra vote for President Donald Trump.
  • The Trump campaign flagged his mother’s name in an email blast to supporters more than a month ago.
  • President-elect Joe Biden ultimately won Pennsylvania by more than 80,000 votes.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

On November 11, the Trump campaign sent an email blast to its supporters, claiming to have discovered three instances of voter fraud.

The campaign said that the identities of three dead people had been used to cast illegal votes in Pennsylvania. John Granahan, Judy Presto, and Elizabeth Bartman have been dead for years, and they had the obituaries to prove it.

They turned out to be right in one case. An illegal vote was cast in Elizabeth Bartman’s name. Prosecutors say her son, Bruce Bartman, impersonated her to cast an additional ballot by mail. Bruce Bartman’s lawyer told Insider he plans to plead guilty.

“Elizabeth Bartman of Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania is shown as having registered to vote in September 2020 and cast a ballot in last week’s election, even though she died in 2008. The Philadelphia Inquirer ran an obituary after Bartman’s passing,” the Trump campaign correctly noted.

The Trump campaign didn’t include one important detail, though: Bartman cast the illegal ballot in his dead mom’s name to vote for President Donald Trump.

“He was angry at people criticizing the president and complaining about the election process, and he wanted to do what he considered civil disobedience by registering his mother and voting her,” the attorney, Samuel Stretton, previously told Insider. “Of course, he was wildly mistaken.”

Insider has not independently verified whether votes were actually cast in the names of Granahan and Presto, the other two deceased individuals named by the Trump campaign. No other independent reports or state agencies have corroborated that votes were cast in their names, either. President-elect Joe Biden ultimately won Pennsylvania by 82,000 votes, so the three votes the Trump campaign claims were illegal would not have swayed the election result.

The Trump campaign has frequently made false claims about dead people who ostensibly voted. In November, it released a list of such names from Georgia voter rolls, but subsequent reporting found that those people were very much alive.

Stretton told Insider that Bartman’s vote in his mother’s name was discovered by the New York Times, who had asked county officials about the names on the Trump campaign’s list. A spokesperson for the Times told Insider that it did not ultimately publish details about Bartman at the time because it could not verify the Trump campaign’s claims.

“Times reporters asked election officials about the case, after the name was circulated by the Trump campaign,” Times spokesperson Danielle Rhoades Ha told Insider. “We did not include details about Bruce Bartman in our coverage because the Delaware County election officials did not respond.”

Delaware County prosecutors said that Bartman’s was the only voter fraud case that checked out after looking into hundreds of tips.

Representatives for Lehigh County and Allegheny County, where Granahan and Presto lived respectively, did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for comment.

Voter fraud is extremely rare in the United States. A database maintained by the right-wing Heritage Foundation found that fewer than 200 cases were convicted between 2000 and 2020, a time period in which hundreds of millions of votes have been cast.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Sidney Powell was at the White House Sunday to push for an executive order that would allow voting machines to be seized

Sidney Powell
During a meeting on Friday, Trump discussed naming Powell as a special counsel to investigate voter fraud.

  • Attorney Sidney Powell was spotted by reporters leaving the White House on Sunday.
  • Powell was there to advocate for an executive order that would allow for voting machines to be seized and examined, the Times said.
  • It’s not clear if President Donald Trump supports the idea. But during a meeting on Friday, he reportedly discussed naming Powell as a special counsel to investigate voter fraud.
  • Powell has spread baseless conspiracy theories about the election for months, with judges dismissing her legal challenges in key battleground states.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Attorney Sidney Powell was spotted leaving the White House Sunday, there to advocate for an executive order that would allow for voting machines to be collected and examined, The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman reported.

CNN White House Correspondent Jeremy Diamond said he saw Powell leaving the residence side of the White House, though she told him she did not meet with President Donald Trump.

It is not clear if the president is interested in Powell’s executive order pitch, but Haberman said the president’s staff has told him it’s not a legally valid option.

The White House did not immediately respond to Business Insider’s request for comment.

The Times had previously reported that the idea of collecting voting machines was floated during a tense White House meeting on Friday, where Powell was also present and clashed with Trump’s advisers.

During that meeting, Trump reportedly discussed naming Powell as a special counsel to investigate voter fraud, though most of his advisers did not support the idea.

The suggestion marked a reversal from last month, when Trump campaign lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis distanced themselves from Powell, saying she was “practicing law on her own” and not part of the campaign team.

Powell has pushed election conspiracy theories for months. One of her central claims is that software used in some states’ elections was manipulated to “flip” votes for Trump to President-elect Joe Biden. There is no evidence this occurred, and Dominion Voting Systems, the company behind the software, is threatening to sue her for defamation if she does not retract her allegations.

Powell asserted this claim about the voting software in election lawsuits she filed in key swing states won by Biden, seeking to have the results in those states overturned.

Her lawsuits, dubbed by her as releasing the “Kraken,” were dismissed in Arizona, Wisconsin, Georgia, and Michigan, with one judge saying the allegations were “sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence.”

A small but increasing number of Republicans have acknowledged Trump lost the election, some only after the Electoral College vote last week formalized Biden’s victory.

But the president has refused to concede and continues to assert baseless claims of widespread voter fraud. Trump’s campaign and allies have accrued a string of legal defeats in an attempt to subvert the election, including a Supreme Court decision to reject a Texas bid to overturn the results.

The campaign’s latest election challenge, filed Sunday, asks the US Supreme Court to toss more than 110,000 mail-in ballots that were cast in accordance with state law.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Fox News is debunking election fraud claims made by its own anchors in response to a legal threat

Rudy Giuliani on Lou Dobbs Fox Business
Rudy Giuliani on Lou Dobbs’ show on Fox Business.

  • For weeks, Fox News hosts have peddled allegations of widespread voter fraud occurring in the 2020 election, a baseless claim that was first made by President Donald Trump. 
  • Election software company Smartmatic sent Fox News a legal threat demanding a “full retraction” of these falsities and inaccuracies. 
  • In response, Fox News created and aired a segment dedicated to debunking various inaccuracies and falsities related to the results of the 2020 election. 
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Over the weekend, Fox News aired a segment that debunked some of the election fraud claims made by its own hosts and anchors.

The network put together a news package that ran across various Fox News and Fox Business Network shows, starting with Lou Dobbs’ show on Friday night. Fox created the segment in response to a legal threat from election software company Smartmatic.

On December 10, Smartmatic hit Fox with a 20-page demand letter obtained by Business Insider asking for “a full and complete retraction of all false and defamatory statements and reports” about the 2020 election. 

Fox News engaged in “a concerted disinformation campaign against Smartmatic” by “continually and repeatedly published demonstrably false information and defamatory statements,” said the letter, which was addressed to Fox News executive vice president and general counsel Lily Fu Claffee. 

“Fox News told its millions of viewers and readers that Smartmatic was founded by Hugo Chávez, that its software was designed to fix elections, and that Smartmatic conspired with others to defraud the American people and fix the 2020 U.S. election by changing, inflating, and deleting votes,” the letter said. 

After the election was called for Joe Biden, Dobbs and other Fox hosts have staunchly defended President Donald Trump’s unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud. Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani – who is one of the people spearheading dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud – appeared on Fox News to cast doubt on the election results.  Sidney Powell, another attorney Trump hired to challenge the election, also appeared on the network.

In its letter to the network, Smartmatic said Fox should not have offered either of them a platform to spread baseless claims to millions of people nationwide. 

“Fox News used its anchors and on-air guests, including Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, to spread lies about a company that had absolutely nothing to do with the voting that took place in areas at the heart of the ‘conspiracies’ discussed following the 2020 U.S. election,” the letter said.

Fox’s segment in response to the letter debunked election fraud claims from both Giuliani and Powell, as well as other Trump supporters. 

In the segment’s original airing Friday night on his primetime evening show, Dobbs introduced the package by telling viewers that “there are lots of opinions about the integrity of the election.” He then brought on Edward Perez, who works with the Open Source Election Technology Institute, a nonprofit dedicated to evaluating election technology.

 

 

“I have not seen any evidence that Smartmatic software was used to delete, change, alter, anything related to vote tabulation,” said Perez, who spoke in what appeared to be a prerecorded segment. 

A Fox News spokesperson confirmed to Business Insider that the segment aired on “Lou Dobbs Tonight” on Friday, “Justice with Judge Jeanine” on Saturday, and “Sunday Morning Futures” on Sunday. 

SmartMatic sent out letters containing similar demands to other conservative networks, including Newsmax and One America News, a spokesperson at the election software company told Business Insider. Newsmax and One America News did not immediately return requests for comment.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Trump supporters rally to overturn the 2020 election, even as the courts continue striking down lawsuits contesting the results

Melissa Regan Trump rally December 12
“We came here to fight for our freedom,” said Melissa Regan from Pike County, Ohio. “We are tired of the corruption, of the stealing of this election.”

  • As President Donald Trump continues to falsely insist he won the presidential election, his supporters are rallying behind him.
  • They gathered in droves today in Washington, DC, to defend Trump’s unsubstantiated accusations of mass voter fraud that have been disproven many times over the last month.
  • President-elect Joe Biden won the 2020 election, and will take office January 20, a point that Trump has not yet explicitly acknowledged.
  • Trump’s supporters at the march also refused to acknowledge Biden’s victory, parroting the same baseless allegations the president has been making since the results came out in November.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Washington, DC, on Saturday in support of President Donald Trump’s failed efforts to overturn the 2020 election. 

Hundreds of members of the far-right Proud Boys were part of the crowd, according to WTOP journalist Alejandro Alvarez, who tweeted a video of a mass of men chanting “fuck antifa” as they walked past a bus advertising the march. The Southern Poverty Law Center classifies the Proud Boys as a hate group with ties to white nationalism. 

The crowd was largely made up of people who refuse to accept that President-elect Joe Biden will be inaugurated next month. January 20 will mark the start of Biden’s presidency. 

Biden won the presidential election with 306 electoral votes, thanks to key battleground states such as Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona. Trump secured just 232 electoral votes. All states have now certified their vote counts, finalizing the election results. 

Since Biden’s victory weeks ago, Trump has refused to explicitly acknowledge his loss. In the hours after the race was called for Biden, Trump said the “election is far from over.” 

He’s since doubled down and sought to overturn the results in state and federal courts across the country. The Trump campaign and the president’s allies have so far filed, and lost, dozens of lawsuits in multiple battleground states contesting the results.

And allegations of voter fraud have been struck down and disproven numerous times since Trump and his lawyers presented their arguments. The Trump-appointed Attorney General Bill Barr, who’s repeatedly positioned himself as one of the president’s strongest defenders, conceded earlier this month that neither the Justice Department nor the FBI found widespread evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election.

The Supreme Court dealt the latest blow on Friday, when it struck down a lawsuit brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to overturn election results in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia.

In the justices’ order throwing out the lawsuit, they cited a lack of “standing,” meaning that Paxton had not sufficiently proved that the state of Texas was harmed in any particular way that could be addressed by the court.

Still, Trump continues to claim otherwise, posting frequently on his personal Twitter account about widespread voter fraud and a “rigged” election. Saturday’s rally is proof that his baseless rhetoric is continuing to resonate with his constituents, despite all the evidence that says voter fraud did not occur.

Business Insider asked some people who attended why they are aligning themselves with Trump’s allegations of voter fraud. Here’s what they had to say.

Andrew Lichtenstein contributed reporting.

“If this election stands, we just do not have a country anymore. It’s as if we are saying, ‘Here, China, take it.'”

Seth Rosenblit, 61, West Hartford, CT, self-employed
Rosenblit is 61 and self-employed, and is from West Hartford, Connecticut.

“I support the president. I know he won the election,” Seth Rosenblit told Business Insider. “They stole our vote, and I will not accept it. That’s why I’m here,” he continued. “It’s just unacceptable.”

“We the people are not going to stop, and I’m speaking for the majority of Americans.”

Tina Fortey, New York City, political activist
Fortey is a political activist from New York City.

“I’m here to fight for our freedoms and to fight for my president against the fraud of this election,” Tina Fortey said.

“We must take our country back. Trump won,” she said, adding that she was “speaking for the majority of Americans,” though Biden won the election with 81 million votes, compared to Trump’s 74 million.

“Time will tell, but President Trump is always 10 steps ahead of everything.”

Dylan Quattrucci, 23
Quattrucci is a 23-year-old from Carmel, New York.

“I’m here today because I believe in election integrity,” Dylan Quattrucci said, before repeating several false allegations about voting machines and election misconduct, which have previously been disproven.

“Dominion machines are responsible for miscounting thousands of votes, and suitcases were found with thousands of votes in the key swing states,” Quattrucci said, likely referring to a viral video showing Georgia election workers taking out large bins of ballots from underneath tables. 

Georgia officials have investigated the videos and determined all the workers were following normal vote-counting procedures, and the bins were full of legal votes that had simply been stored under tables due to the room’s lack of space.

Trump supporters have also accused Dominion Voting Systems of enabling vast voter fraud in the country. In late November, the company tore into one of Trump’s lawsuits claiming “massive election fraud” and called the allegations “baseless,” “senseless,” and “physically impossible.” The company is not a defendant, but it’s mentioned in multiple instances throughout the 104-page Georgia lawsuit.

“I want a full audit of the vote so that we can have faith in free and fair elections in the future,” Quattrucci added, though most states are already required by law to conduct post-election audits, which so far have not found any instances of widespread voter fraud.

“People need to awaken.”

Scott Schultheis, 42, Detroit, Michigan, contractor
Schultheis is a 42-year-old contractor from Detroit, Michigan.

“I’m here for liberty, justice, freedom, and the American dream. Biden is going to take all of those rights away,” Scott Schultheis said, incorrectly adding that “Trump won in a landslide.”

Schultheis described how he noticed Trump appeared to be ahead of Biden by 200,000 votes when he took a nap as election results were coming in on November 4. When Schultheis woke up, “he was losing.”

He continued: “Come on. The fraud is so obvious, it’s disgusting.”

In fact, Schultheis was describing a common misconception about how counties count ballots and report their election results. “Fraud” did not make Trump lose his lead — rather, Trump was never technically leading. Though he appeared to be ahead of Biden in several states on November 3, not enough votes had been counted at the time to accurately project a winner.

Trump’s apparent lead diminished as counties began to report more results, which consisted of legally cast votes that went largely for Biden.

In Pennsylvania, for instance, some counties barred election workers from counting legally cast mail-in ballots on Election Day, requiring them to wait until the next morning to begin counting.

Since the batches of legally cast mail-in votes in many states leaned disproportionately Democratic, Biden’s victory only became clear after those batches were counted and reported.

“There is going to be a bloodbath to pay for it.”

MAGA06.JPG
Warb is retired and lives in Monroe, North Carolina.

“People spoke up when they voted, and that vote was robbed,” Donna Warb told Business Insider. “Everyone knows it and no one is doing anything about it.”

“So we are here in DC to just do the little bit that we can,” Warb continued. “If we do not win, if we do not get this corrected, we are going to be a communist country under a communist leader, and there is going to be a bloodbath to pay for it.”

“I’m a mom and a proud American, and I’m really scared about what is happening in this country.”

MAGA07.JPG
Morin is a 52-year-old mom working in IT in Albany, New York.

“We must speak up. For me, it’s not about an election. It’ about the truth, and good versus evil. I just never realized how much of this country was surrounded by evil,” Lisa Morin said.

“Trump is speaking on our behalf, he is our voice, and watching that voice try to be silenced, it’s just so sad,” she added.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Republican legislators are refusing to pay two Wisconsin counties the $3 million they’re owed for conducting election recounts

wisconsin recount
Observers listen as procedural issues are argued during the process of recounting ballots from the November 3 election.

  • A committee that’s part of the Republican-led state legislature in Wisconsin is refusing to pay two Wisconsin counties the $3 million they’re owed for conducting election vote recounts, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
  • It is unclear why these unnamed Republicans are withholding the money.
  • Residents in Dane and Milwaukee counties overwhelmingly voted for President-elect Joe Biden.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Two Wisconsin counties are being denied the money they’re owed for conducting election vote recounts, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.

The Trump 2020 campaign paid a total of $3 million to Dane and Milwaukee counties after demanding recounts there. President Donald Trump initially lost to Joe Biden by 0.6 percentage points. When the recount was finalized, Biden’s margin of victory had increased.

Candidates requesting officials to recount votes are responsible for the cost, according to Ballotpedia, unless the recount alters the result in favor of another candidate. In that case, the state will cover the recount cost.

The Trump campaign already paid the $3 million recount fee, but the state’s legislature’s budget committee, which has a Republican majority, is withholding it. Republican legislators have not specified why.

A letter from the state’s Joint Finance Committee said one of its 16 members opposed paying the two counties the $3 million they’re owed. The member was not named in the letter.

Dane County Board Chair Analiese Eicher tweeted out the letter, sent to her from Republican committee leaders Sen. Alberta Darling and Rep. Mark Born.

“Just learned that the republicans are objecting to reimbursing Dane County for Donald Trump’s recount,” Eicher said. “Expenses were incurred. We did our job. Time to pay the bill. We’re not a contractor Trump and his allies in the WIGOP can stiff.”

The Trump campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

Wisconsin is just one of the states where Trump filed dozens of lawsuits alleging widespread voter fraud. He’s won none so far. Recount efforts across Wisconsin and other states have not altered the results of the 2020 election. Biden is expected to begin his presidency on January 20, the day he will be inaugurated into office. 

Read the original article on Business Insider

‘No Wisdom, No Courage!’: Trump lashes out at the Supreme Court after it rejected a Texas bid to overturn the election results

Trump
President Donald Trump.

  • President Donald Trump criticized the Supreme Court on Friday after it rejected a legal challenge that would overturn the results of the presidential election.
  • “The Supreme Court really let us down,” he said in a tweet. “No Wisdom, No Courage!”
  • The lawsuit, which was brought by Texas and joined by other Republican-led states, sought to have the election results overturned in four states. The court rejected it due to lack of standing.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

President Donald Trump criticized the US Supreme Court on Friday after it rejected a legal challenge aimed at overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election.

“The Supreme Court really let us down,” he said in a tweet. “No Wisdom, No Courage!”

The lawsuit, which was brought by the Texas attorney general and joined by other Republican-led states, sought to have the election results overturned in four states, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia.

The court said that Texas lacked the standing to bring the case.

Trump decried the decision, noting the many “wonderful” states and Republican officials who supported the case.

“But, within a flash, it is thrown out and gone, without even looking at the many reasons it was brought,” he said. “A Rigged Election, fight on!”

 

Prior to the decision, the president had hyped up the importance of the case. He has also suggested in the past that the election would be decided at the Supreme Court.

The court, which currently has a conservative majority, includes three judges appointed by Trump himself, Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.

The legal challenge was the latest attempt by Trump and his allies to subvert the election and was denounced by many as a legally dubious attempt to have judges intervene in the democratic process.

The loss adds to a string of defeats by the Trump campaign and other Republican officials who have challenged the election results in court, largely to no avail.

President-elect Joe Biden welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision, saying in a statement the court “decisively and speedily rejected the latest of Donald Trump and his allies’ attacks on the democratic process.”

Read the original article on Business Insider

2 fake states are trying to join the Supreme Court case to throw out votes in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania

supreme court trump
People participate in a “Stop the Steal” protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court in support of U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington, U.S., December 8, 2020.

  • Two states that do not exist are trying to join a Supreme Court case to invalidate votes in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
  • The lawyer for “New California” and “New Nevada,” told Insider his “new states in waiting” have an “absolute right” to intervene in the case.
  • The lawsuit to overturn votes was initially brought by Texas and is backed by President Donald Trump, 17 other Republican-led states, and more than 100 GOP members of Congress.
  • Robert E. Thomas III, the lawyer representing “New” California and Nevada, says he’s part of a movement to create new states and curb democracy.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Two states that do not exist are trying to join a lawsuit to invalidate the votes of four states that do.

Entities calling themselves “New California State” and “New Nevada State” have filed a brief to the Supreme Court in a case Texas has brought against Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

The amicus brief for the fake states was filed by Robert E. Thomas III, an attorney with an address listed in Nevada who is a member of the state bar in California, a state that is real.

Thomas told Insider in an interview that New Nevada and New California are “new states in waiting,” and that each is a registered 501(c)(4) organization attempting to form new states using the proper Constitutional process. He said states like Pennsylvania administered their elections in a way that’s “arbitrary and capricious.”

“The Supreme Court gives states in a case like this an absolute right to intervene,” Thomas said. “And we regard ourselves as one of those states with an absolute right.”

The lawsuit seeks to invalidate the votes of tens of millions of voters in those states, all of which President Donald Trump lost.

Since Texas first filed the lawsuit Monday, 17 other Republican-led states, Trump himself, and 106 members of US Congress have thrown their support behind the attempt to overthrow the democratic elections in those states.

The lawsuit contains numerous factual inaccuracies and legal experts expect it to fail.

‘New Nevada’ and ‘New California’ said the real states unfairly administered their elections

Thomas told Insider he’s the chairman and counsel of “New Nevada” and the counsel of “New California,” and is representing the latter at the behest of Paul Preston, the president of New California.

His Supreme Court brief argues that “New California State” and “New Nevada State” have a right to fight the actions of “Old California State” and “Old Nevada State” because of how the November 2020 election was administered.

“Part of the reason for the formation of New California State and New Nevada Sate is to stop the lawless actions of Governors Newsome [sic] (California) and Sisolak (Nevada),” the brief argues.

Donald Trump wildcard
US President Donald Trump looks on during a ceremony presenting the Presidential Medal of Freedom to wrestler Dan Gable in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on December 7, 2020.

Thomas said the governors and county officials in those states wrongly changed election rules rather than leaving it up to the state legislatures.

“We are not only a state in formation, but we are aggrieved parties,” he said, adding: “Since these people are acting without the approval of the legislature, it is what’s called ultra vires, which is illegal on its face.”

The brief argues that “New California” and “New Nevada” are impacted because different counties had different rules for voting.

“New California State and New Nevada State are impacted because both in-person voters and absentee ballot voters are handled differently county to-county within the States of California and Nevada, and differently between how voters are treated in California compared to how voters in Nevada are treated,” the brief reads.

The attorneys general for Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia filed their responses to the Texas challenge on Thursday, saying it had no right to challenge how other states ran elections.

“Texas proposes an extraordinary intrusion into Wisconsin’s and the other defendant states’ elections, a task that the Constitution leaves to each state,” the Wisconsin brief read. “Wisconsin has conducted its election and its voters have chosen a winning candidate for their state. Texas’s bid to nullify that choice is devoid of a legal foundation or a factual basis.”

The lawsuits from Trump and his allies to overturn the will of voters has so far been an overwhelming failure, with zero victories out of nearly 40 lawsuits.

The movement to create new states seeks to curb democracy

Thomas said he’s part of a movement to create new states that generally exclude large urban areas. Similar efforts, he said, are also ongoing in Illinois, Washington state, and New York.

“New California state is all of California except the LA basin, the San Francisco and Sacramento metro areas. New Nevada state is all of rural Nevada except Clark County.”

supreme court trump
Supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump wave a flag at the Supreme Court as the court reviews a lawsuit filed by Texas seeking to undo President-elect Joe Biden’s election victory in Washington, U.S., December 11, 2020.

The movement overall, Thomas said, is rooted in what he described as the American founding fathers’ fear of democracy and that the United States should be a Republic.

He said each 501(c)(4) organization seeks to educate the public about forming a new state using Article 4, sections 3 and 4 of the Constitution, the same method used to create West Virginia in the 1860s.

Before Thomas took up the full-time cause of founding new states, he was a public defender in Oregon and an assistant district attorney in California prosecuting fraud, he said.

“I thought I retired after 40-plus years of practicing attorney and I’m trying to enjoy my retirement and I’m not successful at that,” he told Insider.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Mellissa Carone, Giuliani’s star witness in the Trump campaign’s election fraud case, harassed her fiance’s ex-wife by sending her sex tapes

Melissa Carone
Melissa Carone, who was working for Dominion Voting Services, speaks in front of the Michigan House Oversight Committee in Lansing, Michigan on December 2, 2020.

  • Mellissa Carone, a witness in the Trump campaign’s election fraud lawsuit in Michigan, was recently on probation for harassing her fiance’s ex-wife, it emerged on Saturday. 
  • Over two years, Carone harassed the woman and sent her tapes of herself having sex with the boyfriend.
  • Carone told the Huffington Post that it was her fiance who had really sent the sex tapes, and she agreed to a plea deal to avoid further court appearances. 
  • Carone’s sweeping election fraud claims and confrontational testimony at a hearing in Michigan Tuesday went viral. 
  • The testimony was even satirized in a Saturday Night Live skit, where Carone was played by Cecily Strong. 
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

Mellissa Carone, a key witness in the Trump campaign’s bid to overturn the result of the presidential election in Michigan, was on probation for sending her fiance’s ex-wife sex tapes, it emerged on Saturday. 

According to police records first obtained by Deadline Detroit, Carone harassed the woman for two years, stalking her and sending her explicit videos from an anonymous account of herself having sex with her boyfriend, the woman’s former partner. 

Investigators managed to trace the email account sending the videos to Carone, according to the report, and Carone later told investigators that she had been the person sending them. 

She was initially charged with obscenity and computer crimes, but these were later reduced to a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge as part of a plea deal. 

A spokeswoman for the Wayne County, Michigan, prosecutor’s office confirmed the charges in a statement to the Huffington Post,  and said that her 12 month probation ended just before Election Day.

Carone told the publication that in fact her fiance, Matthew Stackpoole, had sent the tapes, and that she had agreed to the plea deal so they didn’t have to spend any more time in court. He told the outlet that this account was true. 

“The reason I got charged for it is it was sent off of my phone,” Carone told the outlet. “I just said screw it, I’m going to have to take it.”

Business Insider has attempted to reach Carone for further comment through what appears to be her Facebook account. Wayne County prosecutor’s office did not immediately respond to a request for further comment. 

Carone, who describes herself as a cyber security expert, was contracted during the presidential election by Dominon voting systems to work at a Detroit polling station doing IT work. There, she claims to have witnessed widespread voting fraud. 

She appeared as a witness for the Trump campaign at a hearing of the Michigan House Oversight Committee on Tuesday, where the campaign’s chief attorney, Rudy Giuliani, is challenging Biden’s victory. 

In her testimony Carone angrily confronted state officials, and Giuliani appeared at one point to be trying to dissuade her from speaking out further. 

The Trump campaign’s allegations of election fraud have been rebutted by state officials in Michigan, and rejected by courts across the country. 

Footage of the testimony went viral, and was even satirized in a Saturday Night Live skit over the weekend,where Carone was played by Cecily Strong. 

 

Read the original article on Business Insider