The combined stock was worth some $42,218,204 as of Tuesday’s closing price.
DraftKings represents the 17th-largest holding of the Ark Innovation ETF and the 19th-largest component of the Ark Next Generation Internet ETF.
DraftKings’ stock came under pressure on Tuesday after the noted short-seller Hindenburg Research released a report detailing what they describe as “black market operations” at the fantasy sports and sports betting operator.
While the stock fell as much as 12% on Tuesday, it recovered to end the day down just 4%. Now, DraftKings has received some much-needed analyst support.
Thomas Allen, the managing director of equity research at Morgan Stanley, reiterated his “overweight” rating and $58 price target on shares of DraftKings after the short-seller report.
The analyst argued that “unregulated” market exposure is common for international online gaming/sports betting companies and that DraftKings’ partner, SBTech, has exposure that is more in the “grey market” area.
“We are Overweight DKNG on the thesis that its customer acquisition advantage through its legacy DFS business will drive outsized US B2C sports betting revenue and, in turn, profitability compared to consensus,” Allen said.
Jefferies analyst David Katz also maintained his “buy” rating and $75 price target on DraftKings, arguing that the SBTech acquisition was mainly meant to help the company own and developing the right betting technology, not gain international revenue.
Combined, the shares were worth some $52 million based on Tuesday’s closing price of $16.94 per share.
After Wood’s buys, Skillz released its quarterly earnings results that included larger than expected losses and the stock fell as much as 10.83% on Wednesday.
Skillz more than doubled its quarterly losses versus the same period a year ago in the first quarter, losing $0.15 per share compared to analysts’ estimates for a $0.10 loss.
Still, there were plenty of bright spots in the quarterly report. First-quarter revenue jumped 92% year-over-year to $84 million and paid active users surged 81%.
Skillz also raised its full-year revenue guidance to $375 million, which equates to 63% year-over-year growth.
The company landed some analyst support from Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter post-earnings as well.
Pachter maintained his “buy” rating and $34 price target on the stock, citing the impressive growth of the company’s gaming platform.
Skillz also recently added ex-Airbnb Executive Ian Lee as its chief financial officer. Lee was the head of investor relations during Airbnb’s December, 2020 IPO. He holds an MBA in Finance from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Skillz launched a game developer challenge with the NFL last Wednesday as well, adding to the long-term bull case for the stock.
Shares of Skillz traded down 9.29% as of 3:38 p.m. ET on Wednesday.
Strategist Robby Greengold, CFA broke down why Cathie Wood’s ARK Invest could be in for some serious trouble during a market downturn in a Morningstar article on Wednesday.
The analyst illustrated key potential weaknesses in Wood’s flagship exchange-traded fund, the ARK Innovation ETF, including inexperienced analysts, lax risk controls, and an illiquid, bloated asset base.
“Thematic-investing specialist ARK Investment Management has been in tune with the market’s unfolding narrative in recent years, but its lone portfolio manager, inexperienced team, and lax risk controls make it ill-prepared to grapple with a major plot twist,” Greengold wrote.
A one-woman show
It’s no secret Cathie Wood’s active exchange-traded-fund investing strategy has been immensely successful since ARK Innovation’s inception in 2014. Her fund has returned 495% to first-day investors since it began trading on October 31, 2014, and it’s up 183% in the past year alone.
Still, as Greengold pointed out in his article, Wood is the lone portfolio manager at her firm, and there isn’t a deep bench to replace her when she steps down. Greengold questioned whether having only one portfolio manager at ARK could lead to problems in the future, especially given the fund’s struggle to retain talent.
Additionally, Greengold notes that during Wood’s 2001 to 2013 tenure at AllianceBernstein, she “ran several strategies similar to this one that had high volatility, poor downside performance, and underwhelming long-term results.”
ARK Invest did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Greengold was especially critical about the fund’s inexperienced analysts.
Very few ARK analysts have experience beyond an undergraduate degree and only about half of the current team signed on with any work experience, Greengold said. He noted this contrasts with the norm for equity analysts who typically have an undergraduate degree, some internship or entry-level work experience, and at least some progress towards investment credentials like a CFA.
While Wood sees this as a benefit that allows her analysts to have unique perspectives, Greengold questioned their lack of experience. Although he did note Wood’s team is more diverse than much of the competition, and prior research has shown that this leads to more creativity, innovation, and even profits.
Inexperience leads ARK to outsource much of its more technical analysis to what the fund calls “theme developers.” The firm says these include academics, entrepreneurs, and former ARK analysts. According to Greengold, ARK’s “analytical edge remains unclear” given its strategy of hiring such outsiders for technical analysis,
Analysts at ARK also operate differently. Unlike other firms who break up their analysts by sector, ARK analysts are given one or more technological specialties, like DNA sequencing or robotics, and then asked to become experts in their field. Greengold argues this setup “could lead to ultra-specialization and potential blind spots that better-resourced firms wouldn’t miss.”
A lack of risk controls
Greengold also expressed concern about risk management at ARK Invest, citing how Cathie Wood doesn’t employ risk management personnel. The firm also has very few portfolio construction parameters that other firms use to stay within acceptable risk limits.
And on March 29, 2021, “the fund removed prospectus language limiting the size of its top positions and its ownership percentage of individual companies’ shares outstanding.”
Greengold worries this could lead to issues in a market downturn.
“Even a high-octane strategy like this one should be cognizant of the risks embedded in its portfolio and manage to a definable risk tolerance. It seems not to,” the strategist said.
“Without risk-management professionals to stress-test the portfolio’s risk exposures, estimate its potential losses during historical or hypothetical market environments, and gauge worst-case scenarios, the team is poorly positioned to prepare and react,” Greengold concluded.
A less than liquid portfolio
Finally, ARK Innovation’s portfolio has become less liquid and “more vulnerable to severe losses as its size has swelled,” according to Greengold.
Assets under management grew to over $23 billion in February. Additionally, the ETF has more positions in companies in which it holds at least a 10% stake than any other ETF.
Retaining stakes in small companies makes it difficult to sell without materially impacting their stock prices. This forces Wood’s ETF to exit and enter positions slowly over time, which, again, could be a problem in a downturn.
Wood overcomes the lack of liquidity in her portfolio by holding what she calls “cashlike” large-cap names. That way, in a downturn, Wood could sell those stocks and concentrate her holdings in top conviction plays.
The problem is, according to Greengold, that Wood followed a similar gameplan in 2008 at AllianceBernstein and her “large-growth-oriented separate account lost 45% before fees – substantially worse than the Russell 1000 Growth Index’s 38% decline.”
Wood’s ARK Innovation ETF is down 11% this month as a rotation away from highly valued tech names and into value plays continues to drag on results.
Teladoc is now the largest holding in the ARK Genomic Revolution ETF and is tied for the third-largest holding in the ARK Innovation ETF with Roku.
As of market close on March 17, the combined shares bought by Wood’s ETFs were worth approximately $58 million.
Teladoc has been under pressure of late after Amazon announced it’s launching a rival telehealth business called Amazon Care. The service had previously only been available to Amazon employees in the state of Washington.
Now, as Insider reported back in December, Amazon Care is undertaking a national expansion with the goal of serving workers at other major companies in all 50 states.
Teladoc stock fell nearly 8% in a gap down move before Wednesday’s opening after the Amazon Care expansion was confirmed, perhaps signaling to Wood and co. that time was right for a buy.
Shares of the multinational telemedicine and virtual healthcare company have fallen over 36% from mid-February highs. While some investors fear Teladoc may have more downside ahead of it, many experts argue Amazon won’t be able to take over from the Harrison, New York-based firm so easily.
David Larsen, CFA, a managing director at BTIG, told Bloomberg, “the threat is overstated because Teladoc and American Well have contracts with many of the large health plans. Amazon has been very successful in taking market share from your traditional retail storefronts in many areas. But health care is different.”
Teladoc traded down 3% as of 3:49 p.m. ET on Thursday.
At Wednesday’s closing price of $23.59, the shares were worth roughly $62.7 million.
The move made Palantir the 37th largest holding of the ARK Innovation ETF and the 20th largest holding of the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF.
Palantir’s stock has slumped in recent week, after a lockup expiration and a surprise quarterly loss led to considerable insider profit taking at the big data firm. Share prices have fallen over 26% in the past month and a recent tech stock pullback hasn’t helped.
The Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1 ETF, which tracks tech names in the Nasdaq, has fallen nearly 10% since the beginning of February. Much of the move down was caused by a bond sell-off that rocked markets last week, something Cathie Wood said she was “very comfortable” with given her funds’ long-term bias.
Wood has been using the recent tech rout to ‘buy the dip’ in many of her favorite names. The fund manager known as ‘money tree’ doubled down on her Tesla bet (1) (2) amid falling share prices at the EV maker, and now she’s taking another bite at Palantir.
Despite Palantir’s recent slide, a number of analysts still believe in the company’s prospects. Goldman Sachs analysts last month upgraded Palantir to a buy and placed a $34 price target on the firm after earnings.
Analysts, led by Christopher D. Merwin, CFA, argued Palantir now has a clear path to “sustainable growth” as the company continues to win contracts for their Foundry, Gotham, and Apollo software.
Palantir traded up 4.87% during premarket hours on Thursday.